Current news
Wersja polska
Zaproszenie
Koncepcja
Organizatorzy
Koszt uczestnictwa
WaĹĽne daty
Miejsce konferencji
Ceremonia Otwarcia
Imprezy
TwĂłrcy strony
Idea and Organizers
Conference Co-Chairs
The Melville Society
The Conrad Society UK
The Conrad Society US
The Conrad Society PL
IBACL, Univ. of Silesia
Centre College
Web Designers
Conference Program
Poetry Night
Call for Papers
Section One
Section Two
Section Three
Section Four
Sekcja polska
Conference venue
Szczecin in Brief
Hotel Campanile
Novotel Szczecin
How to get there?
Conference costs
Important deadlines
Additional Attractions
Conference publications
General information
Stylesheet
Selection Committee
Important dates
Tall Ships' Races 2007
Supporting events
Schedule of events
Organization Office
Official homepage
Patrons and Sponsors
Recommended links
Contact
Survival Polish
Join Melville-L
Join Conrad-L
Administrative interface
Melville Forum
Jerusalem 2009

SECTION FOUR
(De)Constructing Melville, (De)Constructing Conrad

Issues that the Participants may wish to address might include, but are by no means limited to, the following:

  • What is the importance of language in the respective oeuvres of Melville and Conrad?
  • In what way do respective works of Melville and Conrad combine discourse and non-discursive reality?
  • In what way can Melville and/or Conrad’s work be read as self-deconstructive?
  • What are the fates and shapes of centers and margins in Melville and in Conrad?
  • In what way do respective works of Melville and Conrad deconstruct inherited discourses?
  • How do Melville and Conrad deconstruct discourses of religion/ratio/Truth?
  • What are potential hermeneutic consequenses of deconstructive strategies employed by Melville and Conrad?
  • What are the functions of self-consciousness/self-reflexivity/autotelism in Melville and Conrad?
  • What are the consequences of Melville’s and/or Conrad’s intertextuality and/or transtextuality?
  • In what way can works by Melville and Conrad be read as palimpsests? As metatexts?
  • How do Melville and Conrad employ established genres in their respective oeuvres?
  • In what way do Melville’s and/or Conrad’s works lend themselves to readings in terms of postcolonial methodologies?
  • In what way do supplements and introductions de-center texts by Melville and/or Conrad?
  • How do the readings of Melville and Conrad evolve in the light of postmodern criticism and poststructural theory?
  • How have Melville and Conrad (respectively and/or jointly) been constructed as writers and thinkers in the history of literature and culture?
  • In what way have "canonical” readings of Melville's and Conrad’s works changed in time? How have they been deconstructed? How have they been reconstructed?
  • In what way does criticism construct itself around Melville and/or Conrad?
  • How can Melville and Conrad be read as contributing to the development of postmodern strategies of reading/writing?
  • What are the interpretive results of rewriting Melville/Conrad? What texts do Melville and/or Conrad rewrite? To what effect?
  • How do Melville’s and/or Conrad’s works create alternative (discursive and non-discursive) realities?
  • In what way have central concepts of the phallogocentric, eurocentric Judeo-Christian culture been decentered by Melville and Conrad?
  • What do Melville and Conrad have in common in the context of the findings of poststructural scholarship?
  • In what way have the French, German and American versions of poststructuralist theory influenced the reading of Melville and/or Conrad?
  • Nietzsche/Schopenhauer/Heidegger/Derrida vs. Melville and/or Conrad

     

  • What is herb Viagra? Talking about those herbal Viagra alternatives that do work – what is their effect due to